Logo

Rheumatologists’ guideline adherence in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled study on electronic decision support, education and feedback

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

  1. Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. n.lesuis@maartenskliniek.nl
  2. Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases (ClinTRID), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen; and Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  4. Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  5. Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  6. Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

CER9988 Submission on line
2018 Vol.36, N°1 - PI 0021, PF 0028
Full Papers

Rheumatology Article
Rheumatology Article

 

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
To assess the effects of education, feedback and a computerised decision support system (CDSS) versus education and feedback alone on rheumatologists’ rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guideline adherence.
METHODS:
A single-centre, randomised controlled pilot study was performed among clinicians (rheumatologists, residents and physician assistants; n=20) working at the study centre, with a 1:1 randomisation of included clinicians. A standardized sum score (SSS) on guideline adherence was used as the primary outcome (patient level). The SSS was calculated from 13 dichotomous indicators on quality of RA monitoring, treatment and follow-up. The randomised controlled design was combined with a before-after design in the control group to assess the effect education and feedback alone.
RESULTS:
Twenty clinicians (mean age 44.3±10.9 years; 55% female) and 990 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years; 69% female; 72% rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP positive) were included. Addition of CDSS to education and feedback did not result in significant better quality of RA care than education and feedback alone (SSS difference 0.02; 95%-CI -0.04 to 0.08; p=0.60). However, before/after comparison showed that education and feedback alone resulted in a significant increase in the SSS from 0.58 to 0.64 (difference 0.06; 95%-CI 0.02 to 0.11; p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS:
Our results suggest that CDSS did not have added value with regard to guideline adherence, whereas education and feedback can lead to a small but significant improvement of guideline adherence.

PMID: 28598775 [PubMed]

Received: 06/10/2016 - Accepted : 08/02/2017 - In Press: 05/06/2017 - Published: 05/02/2018