Intra-articular injection of non-animal stabilised hyaluronic acid (NASHA) for osteoarthritis of the hip: A pilot study

P. Berg1, U. Olsson2

1Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala; 2Q-Med AB, Uppsala, Sweden

ABSTRACT
Objectives

This study was undertaken to assess the safety and potential efficacy of intra-articular non-animal stabilised hyaluronic acid (NASHA) in patients with hip OA. 

Methods
This was a prospective, open-label, 3-month pilot study of a single intra-articular injection of NASHA in 31 patients. Safety outcomes were measured at 2 weeks and 3 months after treatment, as were efficacy measurements including WOMAC pain, stiffness and physical function scores, and the patient assessment of global disease status. Patients demonstrating reduced pain at month 3 participated in an extension phase (assessment at 6-11 months; 18 patients). Positive response was defined as a ³ 40% reduction in the WOMAC pain score from baseline, together with an absolute decrease of ³ 5 points.

Results
Intra-articular injection of NASHA into the hip was well tolerated. The only treatment-related AE was exacerbation of pain and/or stiffness in the treated hip (reported by 9 patients) and there were no serious AEs. The response rate to treatment was 50% at 2 weeks and 54% at 3 months. In the extension population, response rates of 69% and 44% were observed at month 3 and the extension visit, respectively. Global disease status was improved at month 3 compared with baseline in 68% of the patients.

Conclusions
Our results show that a single intra-articular injection of NASHA is a well tolerated and potentially effective therapy in the treatment of hip OA. Further studies of NASHA in this setting are warranted.

Key words
Osteoarthritis, hip, injections, intra-articular, non-animal stabilised hyaluronic acid.


This study was supported by a grant from Q-Med AB, Uppsala, Sweden. 
Please address correspondence to: Dr Per Berg, Ortopedkliniken, Akademiska Sjukhuset, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. 
E-mail: per.berg@ortopedi.uu.se

Reprints will not be available from the author.
Clin Exp Rheumatol 2004; 22: 300-306.
© Copyright Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2004.