Effectiveness and safety profile of leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis: actual practice compared with clinical trials

K. Martin1, F. Bentaberry2, C. Dumoulin2, J. Dehais2, F. Haramburu1, B. Bégaud1, T. Schaeverbeke2

1Département de Pharmacologie, INSERM U657; CHU Pellegrin; Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; 2Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France

ABSTRACT
Objective
Leflunomide, an immunosuppressant agent for treating rheumatoid arthritis, was first marketed in France in 2000. Three years after its launch, we sought to assess its prescription patterns in the real world of prescription and use, and to see if its efficacy and safety profiles observed during clinical trials were confirmed.

Methods
All patients treated with leflunomide from May 2000 to April 2003 in the Department of Rheumatology of the Bordeaux University Hospital were identified, and their treatment patterns and outcome ascertained. This was compared to data from clinical trials.

Results
116 were included (mean age = 55 years, 70% women). Almost 21.7% stopped treatment for lack of efficacy (after a mean delay of 3.6 months), 16% for secondary loss of efficacy (median = 7 months), and 32% for the occurrence of an adverse event (half within 4 months). Over a similar time frame in clinical trials, in patients of about the same age and sex but with less severe disease, the corresponding figures were 7-17% for lack or loss of efficacy, and 14-22% for adverse effects. At one year of follow-up, the discontinuation rate was 70% in the cohort compared to 28-47% in clinical trials.

Discussion
The differences between the two populations confirm the need to conduct post-marketing studies in order to obtain better knowledge on the effectiveness and safety of a new drug. In many cases, a simple drug utilization study can provide relevant information on the degree of shift between populations included in clinical trials and those treated in real life.

Key words
Leflunomide, clinical trials, drug utilization, effectiveness, drug safety.


Please address correspondence to: Karin Martin, PharmD, MPH, INSERM U657, IFR 99, Département de Pharmacologie, Zone Nord, Bâtiment 1A, Université Victor Segalen - CHU, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
E-mail: karin.martin@pharmaco.u-bordeaux2.fr

Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23: 80-84.
© CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY 2005.