impact factor, citescore
logo
 

Treatment

 

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of IL1-trap, rilonacept, in systemic sclerosis. A phase I/II biomarker trial


1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

 

  1. Department of Rheumatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  2. Department of Rheumatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  3. Department of Rheumatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  4. Department of Rheumatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  5. Department of Rheumatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  6. Department of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  7. Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  8. Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Division of Epidemiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  10. Department of Rheumatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  11. Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. rlafyatis@gmail.com

CER11243
2018 Vol.36, N°4 ,Suppl.113
PI 0146, PF 0149
Treatment

Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)

PMID: 30277862 [PubMed]

Received: 13/03/2018
Accepted : 23/07/2018
In Press: 30/09/2018
Published: 30/09/2018

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
This clinical trial was designed to study the safety and efficacy of blocking IL-1 in skin fibrosis of patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc), and to test the hypothesis that inhibition of IL-1 by rilonacept will downregulate expression of the 2G SSc gene biomarker as a surrogate for the modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS).
METHODS:
19 dcSSc patients were randomised 2:1 active treatment:placebo in this double blinded trial. Study patients received weekly treatments with either subcutaneous rilanocept 320 mg loading dose at day 0 and then 160 mg for each of the 5 subsequent weekly doses, or placebo. Skin biopsies were taken to test 2G SSc biomarker gene expression at day 0 before treatment and one week after the final study drug dose, comparing gene expression changes between rilonacept- and placebo-treated patients, as well as the change in gene expression at week 6 compared to baseline in rilonacept-treated patients. Safety assessments extended to 6 weeks after the final dose of study drug or placebo. Other secondary outcome measures included global and IL-1-regulated gene expression, serum biomarkers and the MRSS.
RESULTS:
Rilonacept compared to placebo-treated patients did not show any treatment-related effect on the 2G SSc biomarker. Rilonacept treatment also failed to alter IL-6 expression in skin, serum IL-6, C-reactive protein, or CCL18, a marker of IL-6 activity in SSc.
CONCLUSIONS:
In this small trial we did not observe any effect of blocking IL-1 on clinical skin disease or biomarkers of IL-1 activity.

Rheumatology Article

Rheumatology Addendum