Full Papers
Patients' experiences with Behçet's syndrome: structured interviews among patients with different types of organ involvement
Y. Ozguler1, P.A. Merkel2, M. Gurcan3, C. Bocage4, W. Eriksen5, Z. Kutlubay6, G. Hatemi7, P.F. Cronholm8
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Division of Rheumatology and Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
- Department of Dermatology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. gulenhatemi@yahoo.com
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
for the OMERACT Behçet’s Syndrome Working Group
CER11558
2019 Vol.37, N°6 ,Suppl.121
PI 0028, PF 0034
Full Papers
Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)
PMID: 31025933 [PubMed]
Received: 24/07/2018
Accepted : 08/01/2019
In Press: 12/04/2019
Published: 09/12/2019
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Behçet’s syndrome (BS) is a multisystem variable-vessel vasculitis with significant life impact. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of patients with BS with different types of organ involvement.
METHODS:
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 patients with BS with different types of organ involvement. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. A Grounded Theory approach was employed in thematic analysis of translated interviews. Results. Interviews with participants yielded four themes, including symptoms (skin problems, pain, vision problems, fatigue/sleep disturbances, and gastrointestinal/weight loss), impact on function (impact on speech and vision, mobility, energy for tasks, adaptations, and self-care), psychological impact (emotions and emotional management techniques), and social impact (ability to socialize generally and impact on familial relationships).
CONCLUSIONS:
Patients with BS identified several domains, including physical functioning, psychological state, and social identity that are significantly modulated by the symptoms of BS. Those are inter-related with physical symptoms, reflecting the multi-system character of BS, and impair patients’ function impacting on psychological and social identities. This work advances an understanding of BS, and will be useful in developing patient-oriented outcome measures for use in studying BS.