impact factor, citescore
logo
 

Full Papers

 

Can biomarkers predict successful tapering of conventional disease-modifying therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients in stable remission?


1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

 

  1. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
  2. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
  3. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
  4. Leeds Dental Institute, The University of Leeds, UK.
  5. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.
  6. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. p.emery@leeds.ac.uk

CER15516
2023 Vol.41, N°1
PI 0126, PF 0136
Full Papers

Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)

PMID: 35699062 [PubMed]

Received: 23/01/2022
Accepted : 19/04/2022
In Press: 13/06/2022
Published: 23/01/2023

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
Specific guidelines for managing RA patients in clinical remission for ≥6 months on cs-DMARDs are lacking. Tapering of treatment is encouraged, however, without validated biomarkers for success. We aimed to assess the rate of sustained remission after 12 months in patients who either (i) followed structured cs-DMARD tapering or (ii) continued therapy, focusing on the added value of biomarkers as predictors of outcome.
METHODS:
RA patients fulfilling 3v-DAS28CRP<2.6 for ≥6 months on stable cs-DMARD therapy were included. Patients were offered structured tapering, with 117 accepting tapering and 83 continuing therapy. Clinical, ultrasound, immunological (T-cell subsets) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in sustained remission without relapse after 12 months. Regression analyses were used to identify predictors of sustained remission.
RESULTS:
Of those who tapered, 64% remained in clinical remission after 12 months compared with 80% (p=0.018) of patients on stable treatment. In the tapering group, higher levels of CRP, TJC, % inflammation-related T-cell (IRC) and PROs were associated with flare (all p<0.05), with a trend for total PD (p=0.066). A model predicting sustained remission retained RAQoL, total PD and IRC (85% accuracy, AUROC=0.893, p<0.0001). In the non-tapering group, higher CRP, ESR, SJC and shorter disease duration (all p<0.05) were associated with flare, with no parameter able to predict sustained remission.
CONCLUSIONS:
In the tapering group, the combination of clinical, PRO, US and T-cell parameters demonstrated added value for predicting sustained remission compared with clinical parameters alone. These data may inform best tapering practice.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/m7ljv8

Rheumatology Article

Rheumatology Addendum