Full Papers
Ultrasound scoring systems affect the distribution of sialadenitis scores in Sjögren’s syndrome: an inter-system reproducibility study
G. Cafaro1, C. Perricone2, R. Bursi3, I. Riccucci4, S. Calvacchi5, G. Lomurno6, R. Gerli7, E. Bartoloni8
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
- Oral Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy. roberto.gerli@unipg.it
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
CER15883
2022 Vol.40, N°12
PI 2253, PF 2257
Full Papers
Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)
PMID: 36200944 [PubMed]
Received: 25/05/2022
Accepted : 27/06/2022
In Press: 05/10/2022
Published: 20/12/2022
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) is commonly employed in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) and multiple scoring systems have been developed to quantify the grade of sialadenitis of major salivary glands (SG). Their diagnostic performance seems overall comparable, however, the parameters evaluated by the various systems are different. The objective of this study was to compare how four different scoring systems affect the distribution of sialadenitis grades.
METHODS:
One hundred and three SGUS images from 26 SS patients were blindly scored by two investigators according to the De Vita, Salaffi, Milic and OMERACT scoring systems in independent sessions.
RESULTS:
The distribution of SGUS images according to De Vita, Salaffi, Milic and OMERACT systems was significantly different. At post-hoc analysis, Milic system performed differently compared to the De Vita (p<0.0001), OMERACT (p<0.0001) and Salaffi (p<0.0001) systems, showing a relative overestimation of sialadenitis grade.
CONCLUSIONS:
Milic scoring system showed to relatively overestimate the grade of sialadenitis compared to De Vita, Salaffi and OMERACT systems. Although all scoring systems seem to be comparable in terms of diagnostic accuracy, in the prospect of selecting one system to be potentially included in future versions of SS classification criteria, it is important to compare their ability to classify SGUS images among the various degrees of sialadenitis.
