impact factor, citescore
logo
 

Full Papers

 

‘Double target’ ultrasound monitoring of biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis


1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

 

  1. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  2. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy. edoardocipolletta@gmail.com
  3. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  4. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  5. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  6. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  7. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  8. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  9. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.
  10. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy.

CER16961
2024 Vol.42, N°3
PI 0626, PF 0632
Full Papers

purchase article

PMID: 38197192 [PubMed]

Received: 30/06/2023
Accepted : 01/09/2023
In Press: 08/01/2024
Published: 27/03/2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
We aimed to 1) evaluate by power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) the response to therapy of the most inflamed joint and enthesis (target sites) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients starting a biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD); and 2) to investigate the correlation between the US response and clinical data.
METHODS:
Consecutive PsA patients with US synovitis and US ‘active’ enthesitis, starting a bDMARD, were included. The joint with the highest OMERACT-EULAR-US composite score and the enthesis with the highest PD grade (targets) were identified at baseline. The US examination and clinical assessment were performed at 0, 3 and 6 months. The response of OMERACT-EULAR-US synovitis composite score was defined as reaching a grade = 0 at follow-up examination; synovial and entheseal PD responses were defined as a PD=0 and/or a reduction of ≥2 PD grades at follow-up examination.
RESULTS:
Thirty patients were included. Synovitis composite score, synovial PD and entheseal PD showed significant responses at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline (p<0.01). Synovial PD responses were higher than entheseal PD responses at 3 months (71.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.01) and 6 months (77.8% vs. 46.7%, p=0.02). US synovitis responses were correlated with DAPSA (p<0.01) and MDA responses (p=0.01 for composite score, p=0.02 for PD).
CONCLUSIONS:
US was found sensitive for monitoring treatment response in PsA patients starting a biologic drug. Entheseal PD was less responsive than synovial PD, suggesting that enthesitis may represent a ‘difficult-to-treat’ domain in PsA.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/mdjddz

Rheumatology Article