impact factor, citescore
logo
 

Full Papers

 

The impact of two different rituximab-based strategies in cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis secondary to Sjögren’s disease: a monocentric cohort study


1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

 

  1. Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Italy.
  2. Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Italy.
  3. Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Italy.
  4. Institute of Statistics, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Italy.
  5. Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Italy.
  6. Institute of Statistics, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Italy.
  7. Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy.
  8. Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy. luca.quartuccio@uniud.it

CER17625
2024 Vol.42, N°12
PI 2387, PF 2392
Full Papers

Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)

PMID: 39269017 [PubMed]

Received: 02/03/2024
Accepted : 11/04/2024
In Press: 13/09/2024
Published: 19/12/2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
To compare two different rituximab (RTX)-based therapeutic approaches on vasculitic and lymphoproliferative-related disease activity and on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) development in a cohort of patients affected by cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis secondary to Sjögren’s disease (Sjögren-CryoVasc).
METHODS:
Three Sjögren-CryoVasc treatment groups were identified: 1) early RTX induction followed by maintenance; 2) late RTX induction with possible on-demand retreatment; 3) no RTX treatment. The following outcomes were evaluated: a) changes in cumulative ESSDAI, considering vasculitic-related and lymphoproliferative-related domains and changes in ESSDAI specific to each single vasculitic-related and lymphoproliferative-related domain; b) development of NHL; c) occurrence of persistent hypogammaglobulinemia associated with serious infections.
RESULTS:
13 Sjögren-CryoVasc patients were identified: 1) 5/13 treated earlier with RTX with subsequent maintenance; 2) 5/13 treated late with RTX with possible on-demand retreatment; 3) 3/13 not treated with RTX. The two RTX groups showed a decrease in the ESSDAI score with group 1 showing the most substantial reduction (p=0.028). Patients receiving RTX exhibited significant improvement in cutaneous, PNS, and articular vasculitic-related ESSDAI domains (p=0.007; p=0.006; p=0.03, respectively). By contrast RTX did not greatly affect the lymphoproliferative-related ESSDAI domains, even if an improvement was noted in the glandular and nodal domains for group 1 (p=0.03; p=0.03, respectively). No differences in NHL occurrence or safety concerns were observed between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
RTX is an effective and safe treatment to control Sjögren-CryoVasc disease activity with a greater impact when administered earlier with a maintenance regimen. RTX alone cannot, however, affect the possible evolution of Sjögren-CryoVasc into an overt NHL.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/gakvbr

Rheumatology Article

Rheumatology Addendum