impact factor, citescore
logo
 

Full Papers

 

Proposal for a disease severity score for axial spondyloarthritis: results from an Italian longitudinal study


1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

 

  1. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. marco.tasso@unina.it
  2. Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  3. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  4. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  5. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  6. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  7. Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  8. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  9. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  10. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  11. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

CER18583
Full Papers

purchase article

PMID: 40737054 [PubMed]

Received: 31/01/2025
Accepted : 06/06/2025
In Press: 30/07/2025

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
Effective assessment of disease severity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is essential for clinical decision-making, particularly in patients naive to biologic therapy. We developed the Spondyloarthritis Severity Index (SpA-SI), a composite tool designed to capture key clinical and inflammatory domains of axSpA, and evaluated its performance in a prospective cohort.
METHODS:
One hundred bDMARD-naive patients with axSpA were enrolled. The SpA-SI integrates six parameters: FABER test, morning stiffness, VAS for back pain, extraarticular manifestations, peripheral synovial and entheseal involvement, and CRP levels. The total score ranges from 0 to ≥7 points.
RESULTS:
At baseline, the median SpA-SI score was 7.2 (IQR 6.2–7.6; range 3.4–12.2), which significantly improved to 4.9 at 6 months (IQR 2.8–7.0; range 1.2–9.5; p<0.001). SpA-SI showed a strong correlation with ASDAS both as a continuous measure and in categorised disease activity groups (p<0.001). Moderate-to-strong correlations with BASDAI were observed at baseline (r=0.47, p<0.001) and at six months (r=0.79, p<0.001), with similar significance when analysed by group.
CONCLUSIONS:
The SpA-SI represents an exploratory, multidimensional index that captures key clinical and inflammatory domains. By incorporating extra-articular manifestations and physical examination findings, it reflects the complexity of axSpA in routine care. Despite its limitations, including single-centre design and absence of formal validation, the SpA-SI demonstrated strong correlations with established indices and sensitivity to change. These findings support further validation in larger, multicentre cohorts to assess its potential role in complementing existing disease activity measures.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/csf45p

Rheumatology Article