impact factor, citescore
logo
 

Full Papers

 

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients


M. John, F. Angst, G. Pap, A. Junge, A.F. Mannion

 

CER2985
2007 Vol.25, N°2
PI 0195, PF 0205
Full Papers

Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)

PMID: 17543142 [PubMed]

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:
Patient-orientated questionnaires are important instruments for the assessment of outcome in the clinical environment and in musculoskeletal research. The objective of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) into German (PREE-G) and to test its reliability, validity and psychometric properties.
METHODS:
The PREE was cross-culturally adapted for the German language, according to established guidelines. Fifty-six patients who had undergone elbow arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or chronic polyarthritis, on average 11 years previously, were assessed using the PREE-G, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) and the modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (mASES) clinical evaluation.
RESULTS:
The test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) of the PREE-G was 0.80, and the internal consistency 0.96. The PREE-G correlated with the DASH (r = 0.73) and the physical component summary of the SF-36 (r = 0.57) but not with the mental component summary (r = -0.02). The PREE-G correlated moderately with certain clinical findings (mASES) (r = 0.36-0.54; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS:
The PREE-G represents a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate subjective outcome in German speaking patients with elbow pathology.

Rheumatology Article