Clinical aspects
Factors influencing the occupational trajectory of patients with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study
S. Decuman1, V. Smith2, M. Grypdonck3, F. De Keyser4, S. Verhaeghe5
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University; and Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. saskia.decuman@ugent.be
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health - Nursing Science, Ghent University, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University; and Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health - Nursing Science, Ghent University, Belgium.
CER7392
2015 Vol.33, N°4 ,Suppl.91
PI 0026, PF 0030
Clinical aspects
Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)
PMID: 25797634 [PubMed]
Received: 07/03/2014
Accepted : 07/01/2015
In Press: 20/03/2015
Published: 31/08/2015
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To describe, from the patient’s point of view, the factors influencing the occupational trajectory of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
METHODS:
This was a qualitative study designed using grounded theory with constant comparison. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 14 patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology or Leroy-Medsger criteria for SSc.
RESULTS:
Based on our interviews, we found that the occupational trajectory of patients with SSc is influenced by the continuous interplay between four groups of factors. The first group concerns the values patients attribute to work, including identity, normality, financial value, social contact, and structure. The meaning of these values and how they relate to each other underlies the desire to work. A second group of factors is those influencing the balance between daily life, work participation, and medical condition (e.g. job content, flexibility in organising work, and the willingness to ask for accommodations at work). The occupational trajectory is also influenced by external factors, including availability of support, know-ledge of the disease, pressure to work, contact with medical professionals, and existing regulations and the patient’s knowledge about them. Finally, the occupational trajectory is influenced by personal factors, including socio-demographics, psychological assets, and disease- and work-related personal factors.
CONCLUSIONS:
The decisions patients with SSc take concerning work depend on an interplay between many factors and, especially, on the patients’ personal interpretation of these factors. These need to be taken into account when helping patients with SSc determine their occupational trajectory.
