Full Papers
Presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies is associated with better treatment response to abatacept but not to TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis
E. Alemao1, R. Postema2, Y. Elbez3, C. Mamane4, A. Finckh5
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK.
- Excelya, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
- ICON plc, Nanterre, France. carole.mamane@iconplc.com
- University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland.
CER12156
2020 Vol.38, N°3
PI 0455, PF 0466
Full Papers
Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)
PMID: 31770089 [PubMed]
Received: 13/02/2019
Accepted : 08/07/2019
In Press: 16/11/2019
Published: 26/05/2020
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
The objective of this study was to investigate whether anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) status is associated with clinical responses to abatacept or TNF-α-inhibitors (TNF-α-i) in RA patients.
METHODS:
A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed in January 2018 to identify published studies and conference abstracts evaluating biologic DMARD response according to ACPA status. Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis methods were used to pool risk ratios (RRs). In the base-case, treatment response was assessed using EULAR measure, while a scenario analysis assessed response by combining ACR20, DAS28 and EULAR measures. Subgroup analyses were performed for duration of study follow-up.
RESULTS:
Eighteen of the 30 SLR studies were included in the meta-analysis. The base-case showed a statistically significant positive association between ACPA positivity and EULAR response for patients treated with abatacept (RR: 1.13 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.26]), while ACPA positivity was associated with lower EULAR responses to TNF-α-i (RR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.98]). For the scenario analysis, results were consistent with the base-case for abatacept (RR 1.18 [95% CI 1.03, 1.35]), while for TNFα-i, no significant difference by ACPA status was observed (RR 0.97 [95% CI 0.86, 1.10]). Subgroups analyses showed results similar to the base-case for both abatacept and TNF-α-i.
CONCLUSIONS:
This meta-analysis confirms that ACPA-positive RA patients are marginally more likely to achieve EULAR and ACR20 response to abatacept compared to ACPA-negative patients. Additionally, the analysis demonstrates that there is no association between ACPA status and response to TNF-α-i, consistent with findings of previously published studies.
