Full Papers
Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis with respect to responsiveness to biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs: a retrospective cohort study from the FIRST registry
S. Ochi1, F. Mizoguchi2, K. Nakano3, Y. Tanaka4
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, and The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
- Department of Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan. tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp
CER13899
2022 Vol.40, N°1
PI 0086, PF 0096
Full Papers
Free to view
(click on article PDF icon to read the article)
PMID: 33635223 [PubMed]
Received: 06/08/2020
Accepted : 25/01/2021
In Press: 15/02/2021
Published: 28/01/2022
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (dt-RA) is an emerging concept defined as persistency of signs and/or symptoms despite prior treatment. However, whether this refractoriness affects effectiveness and tolerance to next treatment is not fully understood. This study aimed to find cut-off values for a definition of dt-RA with respect to responsiveness to newly used biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs).
METHODS:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the FIRST registry. An inadequate response to current b/tsDMARDs was defined as clinical disease activity index >10 at week 22 or termination of treatment within 22 weeks due to insufficient efficacy. Cut-off values were defined according to the number of past failures to DMARDs and current dose of glucocorticoid. Responsiveness to newly used b/tsDMARDs were compared with respect to above versus below cut-off values.
RESULTS:
Failures to ≥2 conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and ≥4 b/tsDMARDs as well as ≥3mg/day of glucocorticoid were independent cut-off values associated with poor responsiveness to newly used b/tsDMARD treatment. Concomitant use of glucocorticoid was significantly correlated with an increased hazard of infection. Failures to ≥2 csDMARDs was associated with less improvement in inflammatory symptoms, while that to ≥4 b/tsDMARDs was associated with less improvement in health assessment questionnaire and global health as well.
CONCLUSIONS:
We propose cut-off values of ≥2 failures to csDMARDs and/or ≥4 b/tsDMARDs as a definition of dt-RA with respect to responsiveness to use of b/tsDMARDs.
